The `meta' in my page comes from the fact that I freely leach^H^H^H^H^H
cite from other sources. It's not too suprising, it was these sites that
made me realise that the world of anime is wide, exotic and exciting...
as opposed to the handful of dusty titles at the video store. As a
result I grazed happily through reviews of titles I could only dream
of seeing. Although to be honest that's still the case.
And as such i'd like to share them with you, and credit them. This
includes both sites I source from, sites I respect and informational
sites where I go hunting for data on a new titles. Sites are organised
by category, and then by alphabetical order. If you know a site
that isn't on this list, but deserves recognition, feel free to mail
me.
Note that I don't include commercial review sites. While i'm amused by
their willingness to be positive about every title they sell it's a
pretty worthless source for objective reviews. Likewise sites that are
collections of reader reviews are not included. With so much variation
in style and quality it's too hard to work out the bias and quality of
any given reviewer.
Source Sites
These are the sites this site wants to grow up to be like. Foundations
of the online anime review. If you have any interest in an anime review
you've either been there or have missed a rich source of quality reviews.
Is this subtle enough? go visit them now.
They're also the sites I checked when I watched a title. It was very
interesting to me how the various sites, and my own thoughts would
often deviate a lot. After all, there is no such thing as an `ultimate'
review. And, being quality sites, they all support their arguments
which generally means they are all valid ways to view the title. My
original site was based around gathering links to these reviews and
looking for consensus between the reviews (the source of the
meta-review part of the title). This became even more interesting when
I started to write my own reviews.
As a result I owe a great deal to these quality sites. Both for
informing me about new anime (and proving there was great stuff out
there) and making me think more deeply about what I was watching.
Even better these kind people, once my site started to grow a bit
more serious, acknowledged my linking to their reviews. In addition
these reviewers have been polite (more than I deserved) and supportive
when e-mailed.
Undoubtably one of the most important online anime sites. A wealth of
anime info, services and an active reader community even before the
reviews themselves are considered. The popularity of this site being
well represented by some truly obscene hit numbers (web site jealousy
running rampant :) it has generated. And the reviews themselves are
impressive with a large number of titles covered, long and perceptive
reviews and lots of supporting information for each title. It's also
attractively and conveniently presented.
From my experience they're tolerant of a wide variety of genres and
styles and are receptive to slower, artistic or shoujo oriented titles.
It sort of makes sense, given the long and perceptive reviews they like
a title with either depth or meat on it...although in some cases their
reviews are almost longer than the entire script of the title. In general
the site seems relatively positive, if it slams a title then there's a
good chance it's a shocker. The site has roughly 200 reviews, with about
30 of these being reader submitted. At last count 49 of my pages link to
a review on Akemi's.
An extremely elegant page with a quite reasonable number of solid
reviews. The anime critic has made the decision to focus on commercially
released anime which somewhat limits his scope. On the other hand it
means he has good coverage and supporting information for the titles
you can actually buy (well, assuming you're in America). It also means
he is willing to review hentai, although he does not have a large number
of these reviews as yet. In addition he only reviews titles once he has
completely viewed them, leading to each review being fairly authoritative.
There's also a gentle sense of humor to the page which makes it pleasant
reading.
While he disagree's I felt I detected a certain `action' bias in his reviews,
being more positive of titles willing to put on a display and get some
pace going. There also seems to be a preference for fantasy or sci-fi which
links nicely with this. His reviews also seem to be based on the consideration
of someone who bought this material, so he's quite willing to be critical of
a title that can only manage `average'. That said his responses are fairly
considered and balanced and worth taking notice of. He has over 150 reviews,
with about 10 hentai reviews. At last count 53 of my pages link to a review
on the Anime Critic's website.
Lord Carnage's review page is simply great fun to visit...although you've
got to turn java (yech) on to fully experience the weirdness that this
site includes. The site also has a definite flair for the eclectic, with
Lord Carnage seemingly intending to review every anime in existence...and
some of these are awfully obscure. There's also occasional input from
`Herself the Elf' (his sister) who sometimes offers a quite different
opinion or actually writes the review when carnage has obviously fled
the room. Although i'm sure the opposite happens too. The site fairly
beams with the energy of a true anime fan.
The reviews don't seem to be too concerned with being super objective,
which is actually quite a good basis to review from.
The site is quite happy to put the boot (often very amusingly) to a title
that doesn't make the cut. The site also seems to have a taste for weird
titles, fan favourites and titles that generate a sense of energy. Mundane
or slow titles don't seem to be quite as popular, although Carnage's tastes
are nothing if not eclectic. He also seems willing to sample `dodgy' titles
that many other reviewers simply won't bother with. The site contains about
400 reviews (many pages hold multiple reviews) although many are quite short.
At last count 71 of my pages link to a review on Lord Carnage's website.
If you clicked on the link you'll have noticed that this ain't
much of a web-site. It's not that great a book either, but
considering how rare collected info on Western Anime titles is
i've found it a very useful purchase. It covers all OAV's and
movies (here's hoping she does a TV version) in the period from
1983 to 1995, which means that many popular titles fall outside
the period or scope. I don't really agree
with that many of the reviews and a lot of the titles have
`estimated' reviews or indeed no review at all. On the other
hand if you think you've seen every anime title there is then
this book should still deliver up lots of clues for new stuff.
I have 22 citations to this source, although obviously in this case
they are not available on line.
Don't be discouraged by the grey appearance and the rather brutally
efficient interface, this site is worthy of exploration. It's also
one of the few sites to allow titles to be viewed by genre. Behind
this facade are a goodly number of reviews, many of them being quite
interesting and obscure titles. And while some of the reviews are
not immense in size the newer ones, and revised older ones, are
quite sizable. In addition the site doesn't spend much time on
synopsis, allowing the review to focus on quality and importance
of the title. The style is generally a touch dry, but more than
makes up for this in being knowledgeable and very fair and
calm even for titles that he doesn't really like. There's also
some obsure treasures on this page, as befits one of the older
review sites I source from. At last count 24 of my pages have links
to reviews on this site.
Note that this site doesn't use a 5 star grading system, but a
more expressive system well described on the first page of the site.
For convenience I compressed this down to a rating, but you will
get more out of it if you visit the site and read the rating system.
I also got an e-mail explaining that I had over-simplified it, and
the site author helpfully offered this conversion guide, for which
I am grateful.
- A+ to A = 5/5
- A- to B+ = 4/5
- B to B- = 3/5
- C+ to C- = 2/5
- D+ to D- = 1/5
- F = 0/5
The first review site I found, and without doubt one of the best review
sites on the internet. When it looked like the page was comatose, something
that thankfully turned out to be temporary, the idea of losing access to
this material was terrifying. The page has a rich collection of links and
miscellanea much of which is very illuminating and amusing, with THEM
having a strong sense of humor. The current page design brings the concept
of minimal HTML to a new level (at least on my browser) but is very
accessible. Don't let it put you off though, it's only a place to pass
through on the way to the reviews.
And while at about 300 reviews they might not have the largest number,
and Akemi generally has longer reviews, these are exemplary reviews.
To begin with they have a readable, memorable and often gently humorous
style. They're also eclectic, having reviews for all sorts of titles you
won't find elsewhere. This includes a willingness to explore and enjoy
shoujo or slower titles. And, finally, the reviews are often perceptive,
willing to find novel viewpoints on even well known titles, and very fair.
Be warned however that their `suitability' advice is pretty strict,
although I guess it makes sense to take this approach. Also, some of their
reviews have been watched in a group environment which can lead to one
`element' of the title dominating the review. This is pretty rare
though. In general the reviews are so well written and perceptive that
they're enjoyable reading even if you never expect to see the title.
At the current time I have 94 pages that link to a review on their
site.
It's also worth mentioning that THEM is actually a fan-group. Which
motivates their reviews and gives them a pool of writers. Normally I
consider this a negative, as it makes it hard to get the `character'
of the review bias. However given the quality of THEM, the fact that
the majority of the reviews are by a small subset of THEM, and shared
taste / editorial control it doesn't seem to be a problem.
Information Sites
These sites probably contain reviews as well, and in most cases they're
worth visiting for that reason alone. However what makes them really
valuable is the large amount of data that has either accumulated or been
gathered within these pages. As any serious anime fan will know collected,
organised and accurate information is hard to find. This is especially true
for information that steps past the narrow range that is commercially
available. These sites are ones that I have found helpful when hunting
information on either a specific title or about the width of material that
has been covered in anime.
Wonderful. Absolutely wonderful. Having suffered through the Anime Movie
Guide, and feeling ripped off by the Erotic Anime Movie Guide, this tome
has completely redeemed the authors. This sizable book capitalizes on the
strength of the authors research and the desperate need for solid data on
the immense number of anime titles that exist. And it's here in shovel
sized amounts. Creators, episode numbers, solid synopsis and the often
complicated history some of these titles have followed before coming to
the attention of the western market. For those who want to hunt out
obscure titles, or understand the true width of the anime medium, this
book is invaluable.
And, even better, the format is extremely accessible. For one thing it's
got a much wider historical span. Not only does it replace the rapidly
aging anime movie guide but it also goes into much earlier anime than that
volume. And, in a huge advance, it also contains information on television
anime. Meanwhile it is ordered by name, rather than the movie guides
questionable decision to order by date, and contains some good indices to
make finding the information you want much easier. The index also helping
decode the many names an anime title tends to gather over time and
translation. Great stuff, cleanly designed, well printed and with really
no competition.
If I had to indicate a negative, just for balance, it would be that it has
changed from being a review guide to an information source. Some of Helen
McCarthy's views, which I generally find little agreement with, still shine
through but in general the tone is neutral and data centric. The titles
are not rated in any way. As such while it is superb for those who want
facts (such as, um, people who have anime review web sites) it might be
less useful for those who want to know what to watch next. Although in all
honesty the synopsis of the show really does go a long way towards helping
selection. Although I am envious of the anime fan who has a chance to find
even 20% of the material covered in this sizable book.
to be reviewed in the near future
This has quickly become the authoritative site for worldwide info on
anime DVD releases. And since this media is well suited to anime, and
popular with fans and companies, it looks like it's importance will
only continue to grow. And, on visiting, it's not too suprising. The
site is detailed, complete and practical. It includes all sort of
information and includes title reviews. Mind you these reviews often
focus on the technical quality of the DVD rather than the content. As
a result, for the purposes of this page, it's considered to be an
information site. Still, absolutely worth a visit.
Yes, it's a book, so no online links. I wrote a review of this book
for the Hentai anime FAQ, which i'll reproduce here.
When considering erotic anime good information is both needed (there's
no shortage of stuff to avoid) and hard to come by (since many sources
won't cover the domain). Thus the "Erotic Anime Movie Guide", by
Helen Mc Carthy & Johnathan Clements (ISBN:1-185286-946-1) seemed like
a promising possibility. Even though, being sold at a comic specialty
store, it was expensive and shrink-wrapped.
Which is a shame, because the contents are not quite what you might
expect. Especially given that it shares the style, and one of the
authors, from the more useful "Anime movie guide". The first thing is
that about 2/3 of this slim volume (190 pages) is actually filled with
`film studies' essays on various elements of erotic anime. While some
of these are interesting to serious students of anime history, although
there are some doubtful arguments, they're not actually much use for
understanding erotic anime. The subjects are old news and well known by
most anime fans (U-jin,Go-Nagai,Overfiend etc.).
Even more disappointing is the list of 200 reviews provided. A lot of
these have only a marginal erotic content, or are provided to back up
arguments made in the essays. Thus titles such as Dirty Pair, Gunbuster,
Doreamon and Oh My Goddess have reviews, despite requiring a lot of
imagination to see these as `erotic anime'. And there are lots more
titles that simply don't belong in this book. The remaining reviews
tend to be well known, commercially released, titles that are largely
synopsis rather than commentary.
While this is an interesting book, especially to someone interested in
the history and development of erotic anime, it is largely useless as
a guide to the genre. Those planning a purchase should definitely find
a copy to look through first.
How can I write something yet, I haven't even seen all of his site yet.
The things huge!
to be reviewed in the near future
While initially the multitude of options on the front page is confusing it
is worth persevering. Not because the interface gets less complex,
but because you realise there's an immense amount of material in the database
from which it is generated. And this includes interesting information on titles
you won't see on any other anime page. The reach and breadth of this page
really must be seen to be believed. And while the reviews are great, although
perhaps a bit small or variable at times (probably since in some cases they come
from other sources) the wealth of material, and support information is what makes
this an invaluable site. It's also an English site, leading to it being a nice
balancer and having information on anime screened in England and Europe.
This is his description of his own site: Contains anime reviews (some
illustrated), manga reviews (mostly illustrated), and general Japan info,
scripts, synopses, miscellaneous information. Shoujo anime and manga are
featured. TV Anime from European satellites is also featured.
A quick glance at the list of review sites on the anime turnpike will reveal
that there's a sizable number of possibilities. However a more detailed search
will reveal the normal number of dead links, a sizable number of dead sites and
a reasonable number of sites where reality did not quite measure up to
ambition. Not too much of a suprise, writing reviews is a time consuming and
relatively minor element of anime fandom.
Even with this reality there are a number of sites that either stand out as
having value or the potential for value. And given that the turnpike list
gives no indication of quality (or even existence) I thought i'd mention
some of them here. In many cases these sites are similar to my original
vision, giving hints and links rather than long reviews, and they generally
don't have the width or depth of my source sites. That said, the more
reviews available for a title you're considering the better informed you'll
be.
I'd also ask anyone looking over this list to please e-mail me if you notice
that the site has died. While i'm not going to spend too much time on this
list there's little point in keeping a page full of dead links. Likewise
if you've noticed a quality anime review site (and only review sites please)
that's missing i'd love a pointer.
This site was originally one of my source sites, and there's still lots
of good material to be had. That said it spent a lot of time semi-dormant
and now has a bad case of .com disease. So much energy is being extended
in so many avenues other than the vital task (well, from this pages point
of view :) of reviewing anime. The reviews also show signs of different
authors but are not credited, making learning their `style' more difficult.
Even so, well worth a visit and you might find their other services even
more valuable than their reviews.
Only recently open to the public (I was visitor 100 and something) this site
is rich in possibility rather than being complete now. On the positive side
it has some interesting titles amongst a reasonable number of reviews. On the
downside the reviews are shorter than one would like and the reviewers seem to
find it difficult to review an anime that doesn't interest them. Here's hoping
the site continues to grow.